INTEGRITY IN WRITTEN AND VIDEO NEWS, featuring newsOS integration and a growing interactive community of interested and increasingly well-informed readers and viewers who help make us who we are… a truly objective news media resource with full disclosure of bias, fact-checking, voting, polling, ratings, and comments. Learn about our editorial policies and practices (below). Join us today by subscribing to either our FREE MEMBERSHIP plan, or our PLATINUM PAID SUBSCRIPTION plan; each plan offers an unparalleled suite of benefits to our subscribers. U.S. DAILY RUNDOWN:Your News, Your Voice.
Tag: legal challenges
The Looming Supreme Court Rulings on Religious Rights: Legal Challenges and Societal Impact
The United States Supreme Court is poised to issue a series of rulings that could significantly reshape the landscape of religious rights in the nation. The cases in question hinge on the intersection of constitutional guarantees, societal values, and evolving legal interpretations. As the Court considers whether to expand the scope of religious freedoms, the issue at the heart of these cases revolves around the extent to which the government can impose restrictions on religious expression and practice without infringing on the First Amendment.
Trump Kills ‘Disparate Impact’ in Biggest Civil Rights Enforcement Rollback Ever
On April 23, 2025, President Donald Trump issued an executive order titled "Restoring Equality of Opportunity and Meritocracy," effectively eliminating the federal government's use of disparate-impact liability in enforcing civil rights laws. This legal doctrine, established by the Supreme Court in Griggs v. Duke Power Co. (1971), allows courts to challenge policies that disproportionately harm protected groups, such as racial minorities, women, and the disabled, even without evidence of intentional discrimination. The executive order directs federal agencies to deprioritize enforcement of such regulations and calls for repealing parts of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, citing alleged conflicts with merit-based practices and constitutional protections.