Tag: executive power

In early May 2025, the Trump administration unveiled a trifecta of proposals that reignited controversy over executive Power, immigration policy, and international trade. The proposals included (1) offering $1,000 payments to undocumented immigrants who voluntarily leave the United States, (2) imposing a 100% tariff on foreign films, and (3) reopening Alcatraz Island as a high-security detention facility for undocumented migrants. Each measure, although distinct in domain, converges around a central constitutional question: To what extent can the executive branch wield unilateral power in service of symbolic political aims, particularly when such actions collide with established statutory frameworks and international norms?

The United States Supreme Court's recent engagement with cases involving former President Donald Trump has reignited debates surrounding the extent of presidential immunity and the balance of powers within the federal government. Notably, the Court's intervention in halting the deportation of Venezuelan migrants under the Alien Enemies Act marked a significant moment in the judiciary's assertion of authority over executive actions. This development underscores the ongoing tension between safeguarding national security and upholding constitutional protections.

The inauguration of President Donald J. Trump for a second, non-consecutive term on January 20, 2025 Policy Initiatives and marked a pivotal moment in American political history. As the 47th President of the United States, Trump's return to the Oval Office was characterized by an assertive policy agenda aimed at redefining the nation's economic, social, and geopolitical landscape. Within the first 100 days, the administration implemented a series of executive orders and legislative actions that have sparked intense debate across the political spectrum.

On May 4, 2025, aboard Air Force One, former President Donald J. Trump made headlines by revealing that Stephen Miller, his long-time senior advisor and architect of some of the administration's most controversial policies, is under serious consideration for the role of National Security Adviser (NSA). This announcement followed the dismissal of Rep. Mike Waltz from the position, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio stepping in temporarily. While Trump stressed no urgency in finalizing the appointment, the mere suggestion of Miller’s name has reignited fierce debates across the legal, academic, and policy communities.

In April 2025, President Donald Trump introduced a series of sweeping policy measures that have significantly impacted both domestic and international landscapes. These measures include the imposition of extensive tariffs on foreign imports and a stringent crackdown on sanctuary cities within the United States. The tariffs, announced on April 2, 2025, and referred to by the administration as "Liberation Day" tariffs, aim to protect American manufacturing and address trade imbalances, particularly with China. Concurrently, the administration has intensified efforts to enforce federal immigration laws by targeting sanctuary jurisdictions that do not cooperate with federal immigration enforcement.

In the opening months of President Donald J. Trump's second term, the United States finds itself navigating a period marked by unprecedented assertions of executive authority. Following a tumultuous reelection campaign and an equally polarizing inauguration, the Trump administration has initiated a wave of executive actions aimed at restructuring key federal agencies, reconfiguring national security strategy, and reshaping America’s global posture. These initiatives have reignited enduring constitutional debates over the scope of presidential power and the safeguarding of democratic institutions.