INTEGRITY IN WRITTEN AND VIDEO NEWS, featuring newsOS integration and a growing interactive community of interested and increasingly well-informed readers and viewers who help make us who we are… a truly objective news media resource with full disclosure of bias, fact-checking, voting, polling, ratings, and comments. Learn about our editorial policies and practices (below). Join us today by subscribing to either our FREE MEMBERSHIP plan, or our PLATINUM PAID SUBSCRIPTION plan; each plan offers an unparalleled suite of benefits to our subscribers. U.S. DAILY RUNDOWN:Your News, Your Voice.
Tag: constitutional law and education
Tennessee’s DEI Crackdown: A Constitutional, Legal, and Policy Analysis of Nashville’s Stand Against Statewide Prohibitions
In a contentious and evolving landscape at the intersection of education, governance, and civil rights, Nashville’s Metro Nashville Public Schools (MNPS) recently declared their intention to oppose new Tennessee state laws restricting Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs. The clash comes as Republican state lawmakers, emboldened by broader national movements, seek to limit or prohibit DEI initiatives across public institutions, citing concerns over fairness, free speech, and government overreach.
Supreme Court Wades Into Fiercest Free Speech Fight of the Decade: Mahmoud v. Taylor Could Redefine Parental Rights in Education
The United States Supreme Court's deliberation in Mahmoud v. Taylor represents a significant juncture in the ongoing discourse surrounding the intersection of religious liberty and LGBTQ+ representation within public education. Originating from Montgomery County, Maryland, this case centers on a group of parents—comprising Muslim and Christian families—who challenge the school district's decision to include LGBTQ+-themed storybooks in elementary curricula without providing opt-out provisions for religious objections.
Harvard Fights Back: First Major Legal Showdown Over the Most Aggressive Federal Crackdown on Academic Freedom in U.S. History
In April 2025, Harvard University initiated a legal challenge against the Trump administration, contesting the federal government's decision to freeze $2.2 billion in grants. This action was perceived by Harvard as an attempt to exert control over the university's academic decisions, particularly in response to campus protests concerning the Gaza conflict. The administration's demands included the appointment of an external overseer to ensure "viewpoint diversity," which Harvard viewed as a direct infringement on its academic freedom.