Top News Stories

Q1 2025 GDP Contraction: In the first quarter of 2025, the U.S. economy shrank by 0.2%, a development that has sparked significant concern among economists, policymakers, and legal scholars. According to Bloomberg, this contraction is largely attributed to a surge in imports coupled with slowing consumer spending. The underlying catalyst appears to be the Trump administration's ongoing trade policies, which have included tariffs on key goods and a reorientation toward economic protectionism. These moves, while touted as measures to protect American industry and ensure national security, have raised fundamental legal and policy questions.

On January 5, 2024, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported that the JN.1 subvariant of SARS-CoV-2 accounted for approximately 62 percent of all COVID-19 cases in the United States—an increase from an estimated 39 to 50 percent just two weeks earlier. JN.1, an offspring of the BA.2.86 Omicron lineage, rapidly emerged as the dominant strain not only in the U.S. but globally, driving surges in hospitalizations and prompting renewed public health vigilance (). While current vaccine formulations remain effective in preventing severe illness, the swift transmissibility of JN.1 has reignited debates over federal and state powers to enact, modify, or rescind mitigation measures, including vaccine recommendations, mask mandates, and travel restrictions, under U.S. constitutional constructs. In light of this, legal scholars must revisit foundational public health statutes, Supreme Court precedent on police power and individual liberties, and evolving administrative procedures to understand how emergent variants like JN.1 reshape policy responses.

Vera Rubin American Women Quarter Release: On June 2, 2025, the United States Mint begins shipping the 2025 American Women Quarters honoring Dr. Vera Rubin, a pioneering astronomer whose work confirming the existence of dark matter reshaped modern astrophysics (Manila Times, 2025). This release represents the fourth of five themes in the American Women Quarters Program (AWQP), a multiyear initiative legislated by Congress to celebrate the contributions of women in American history. While the Mint’s announcement foregrounds design details and logistical rollout, the program implicates broader legal and policy frameworks—ranging from the Coinage Act’s delegation of design authority to debates over representational equity on U.S. coinage. Beyond commemorating Dr. Rubin’s scientific achievements, the AWQP rekindles tensions regarding federal authority over national symbols, equitable representation of historically marginalized groups, and the cost-benefit calculus of commemorative coin programs.

Pride Month 2025, traditionally a period of celebration and solidarity within LGBTQ+ communities, is facing unprecedented challenges as a convergence of state-level legislative actions and shrinking public funding threaten to undermine events nationwide. In recent months, numerous state legislatures have enacted or proposed bills restricting public expressions of LGBTQ+ identity, while municipal budgets—strained by lingering economic uncertainties—have led to abrupt cuts in support for Pride festivities. The Guardian US reported on May 29, 2025, that these twin pressures are creating a fragmented landscape in which organizers must navigate both legal uncertainty and financial precarity (“Pride Month 2025 Faces Challenges,” The Guardian US, 2025).

In an address delivered on June 2, 2025, Federal Reserve Governor Christopher Waller reaffirmed that interest rate cuts remained “on the table” for later this year, despite President Trump’s imposition of new import tariffs that were expected to generate temporary upward pressure on prices. This development raises a constellation of legal, institutional, and policy questions at the intersection of monetary authority, executive power over trade, and broader constitutional checks and balances. Although the Federal Reserve (the “Fed”) is statutorily insulated from direct political influence under the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 (12 U.S.C. § 225a), the advent of high-profile tariff measures—ultimately enjoined by the U.S. Court of International Trade—has rekindled debates over whether and how trade policy ought to factor into the Fed’s policy calculus. Moreover, recent litigation (e.g., V.O.S. Selections, Inc. v. United States, 2025) has tested the bounds of executive authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 (“IEEPA”), raising profound questions about separation of powers and statutory delegation.

On June 1, 2025, at approximately 1:30 p.m., a makeshift flamethrower and incendiary devices were unleashed upon a peaceful demonstration on Pearl Street Mall in Boulder, Colorado, injuring eight participants in what federal authorities immediately classified as a targeted act of terrorism (turn0news16, turn3news16). Participants of “Run for Their Lives,” a weekly event organized to raise awareness about Israeli hostages held in Gaza, witnessed a shirtless suspect—later identified as 45-year-old Mohamed Sabry Soliman—shouting “Free Palestine!” while deploying homemade Molotov cocktails and a DIY flamethrower into the crowd (turn0news17, turn1news12). Victims ranged in age from 52 to 88, including an 88-year-old Holocaust survivor, two of whom required air transport to a specialized burn unit in Aurora, Colorado (turn0news18, turn1news14). Within minutes, local law enforcement and FBI agents arrived on scene, detaining the suspect without resistance and treating injured victims (turn3news16).