Top News Stories

On April 23, 2025, President Donald Trump issued an executive order titled "Restoring Equality of Opportunity and Meritocracy," effectively eliminating the federal government's use of disparate-impact liability in enforcing civil rights laws. This legal doctrine, established by the Supreme Court in Griggs v. Duke Power Co. (1971), allows courts to challenge policies that disproportionately harm protected groups, such as racial minorities, women, and the disabled, even without evidence of intentional discrimination. The executive order directs federal agencies to deprioritize enforcement of such regulations and calls for repealing parts of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, citing alleged conflicts with merit-based practices and constitutional protections.

On the 100th day of Donald Trump's return to the White House, former Vice President Kamala Harris delivered a sharp rebuke of the administration's policies during a keynote speech at Emerge America’s 20th anniversary gala. Framed not merely as political dissent, her remarks tapped into deeper legal and constitutional anxieties about the trajectory of executive power, civil liberties, and democratic accountability in the United States.

In a significant move that could reshape the landscape of financial regulation in the United States, the House Financial Services Committee is deliberating on legislation aimed at reducing funding for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and dissolving the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). These proposals are part of a broader Republican initiative to curtail federal spending and streamline government functions. The CFPB, established in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, serves as a watchdog for consumer financial products, while the PCAOB oversees the audits of public companies to protect investors and the public interest. The proposed changes have sparked a debate over the balance between regulatory oversight and economic efficiency.

On April 30, 1975, Saigon fell, marking the official end of the Vietnam War. Yet half a century later, the full cost—legal, moral, and geopolitical—continues to reverberate. From lingering environmental and health impacts of Agent Orange to the human toll of unexploded ordnance (UXO) and ongoing diplomatic fragility, the legacy of America's most controversial war remains deeply embedded in both countries’ domestic and foreign policy landscapes.

In 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court's labor docket is poised to address pivotal issues that could redefine the landscape of employment law in America. Central to this docket are cases that question the boundaries of anti-discrimination protections, the standards for wage law exemptions, and the extent of religious liberties in employment contexts.

In the evolving and often polarizing landscape of U.S. immigration policy, the role of local law enforcement in federal immigration enforcement has become a focal point of legal and political contention. Recent moves by the Trump administration to revitalize and dramatically expand the 287(g) program—a federal initiative that deputizes local police officers to carry out certain immigration enforcement duties—have rekindled debate over the boundaries of constitutional authority, the protection of civil liberties, and the practical implications for communities across the country.