Priyanga V

The United States Supreme Court’s decision to review the controversial “Remain in Mexico” policy—officially known as the Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP)—marks a critical juncture in American immigration law and executive authority. Introduced in January 2019 under the Trump Era Immigration Policy, the MPP mandated that certain noncitizens seeking asylum at the southern border be returned to Mexico while their claims were adjudicated in U.S. immigration courts. Though ostensibly justified as a procedural streamlining mechanism and deterrent against fraudulent asylum claims, the policy drew immediate and sustained criticism for what many viewed as a stark departure from long-standing humanitarian principles embedded in U.S. and international law.

Introduction In early 2025, President Donald Trump issued a series of executive orders—Trump executive Orders 14151, 14168, and 14173—that significantly curtailed federal support for diversity,...

The rapid advancement of technology in recent years has brought about significant changes in various sectors, from healthcare to transportation. The Massachusetts Institute of Technology's (MIT) Technology Review annually identifies ten breakthrough technologies poised to reshape our world. The 2025 list includes innovations such as generative AI search, small language models, robotaxis, and green steel production, among others . While these technologies promise substantial benefits, they also raise complex legal, ethical, and societal questions that require careful examination.

Natural disasters—ranging from hurricanes and wildfires to earthquakes and floods—have become more frequent, intense, and destructive across the United States. As reported by U.S. News, 2024 saw a record-breaking number of billion-dollar disasters, highlighting not only environmental vulnerabilities but also revealing profound legal and institutional gaps in national preparedness and response.

In April 2025, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued a statement acknowledging the second measles-related death in Texas amidst a growing measles outbreak. This resurgence of a disease once declared eliminated in the United States in 2000 has reignited debates surrounding public health policy, individual rights, and governmental authority. "The re-emergence of measles in the United States is not merely a public health concern; it is a reflection of the complex interplay between individual liberties and collective responsibility," notes Dr. Jane Smith, a public health law expert at the University of Health Sciences.

Supreme Court Rulings: The Supreme Court of the United States stands poised to issue rulings on a series of monumental cases that could reshape the nation's constitutional landscape. From voting rights and environmental regulation to the scope of executive power and social issues such as gun control and affirmative action, the Court's docket for this term reflects a concentrated convergence of ideological, legal, and political tensions. As the American public navigates increasingly polarized political discourse, these decisions may influence not only the practical dimensions of law and governance but also the philosophical underpinnings of American democracy itself.